All too often corporations or individuals hire a professional Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TS CM) or "bug sweep" service provider only after executive email list they have a strong suspicion they are a victim of illegal eavesdropping. While it may seem like a logical approach to verify your suspicions first, the choice to delay can be an irresponsible and executive email list costly choice. Every minute an illegal eavesdropper maintains access to your information is valuable to the eavesdropper -- and costly to you. The longer you wait, the more opportunity the eavesdropper has to gather enough competition sensitive, company proprietary or damaging executive email list personal information to cause your company, or you, irreparable harm. Why do corporations and/or executives hesitate executive email list to hire a TS CM/Bug Sweep provider quickly? Fear is a key reason executives delay hiring a professional TS CM service provider. It could be a fear that competitors or employees will recognize the executive email list company, or its executive(s), suspect they are vulnerable to illegal spying. Simply acknowledging the company or its executives are exposed and/or having to obtain authorization executive email list from owner(s), Board Members, etc. can be difficult. The need to obtain authorization from corporate counsel and/or financial decision makers is another key reason for delaying. And, the executive(s) who make a decision to executive email list proceed with a Bug Sweep may also be discredited as paranoid by coworkers. Who wants their coworkers to think they are paranoid? But, no matter what the motivation for a decision to delay, the perceived vulnerability is not going to "just go away." And, a failure to take action quickly executive email list and decisively can be the beginning of the end for the corporation and/or the executive(s). Is it responsible to forgo taking action because you are fearful of the ramifications? If indeed your executive email list company or your executive(s) are the victim of illegal eavesdropping it is negligent to allow the exposure to continue.